Skip to content
Software ReviewsGEO Tools

Otterly AI Review 2026: The Engines You Pay Extra For

Otterly starts at $29 and names seven engines on its homepage. Four are in the plan and three are paid add-ons. What that costs, and what we verified.

· Updated · 11 min read

Otterly AI is an Austrian AI search monitoring platform that starts at $29 a month and counts Roche, Opera, Visma and Avis Budget Group among its named customers. It is one of the older products in a young category, founded in 2024, and the only one in this comparison with a Wikipedia article.

Its homepage names seven AI engines. Its pricing page includes four of them. The other three are add-ons, and the gap between those two lists is the thing worth understanding before you buy.

Disclosure: EchoWi competes with Otterly. Prices, engine lists and company details below were read from its own pages on 6 August 2026.


The short version

  1. From $29 a month for 15 tracked prompts, with a free trial and no card required.
  2. Four engines are included at every paid tier. Claude, Gemini and Google AI Mode are sold separately.
  3. There is almost no volume discount between the $29 plan and the $189 one.
  4. A real customer list, including Roche, Opera, Visma, Check24, IQVIA and Avis Budget Group.
  5. It is documented inside Semrush’s own knowledge base, while Semrush sells a competing product.

What it costs, verified

PlanMonthlyAnnualPrompts
Lite$29$25/mo15
Standard$189$160/mo100
Premium$489$422/mo400
EnterpriseCustomCustomCustom

Read from Otterly’s own pricing page on 6 August 2026. Annual billing saves 15%. Every tier includes unlimited team members, daily tracking and unlimited brand reports, which is genuinely generous: most competitors charge per seat, and Scrunch adds $25 a month for each one.

Engines included on every paid tier: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot.

Engines sold as add-ons: Claude, Google Gemini and Google AI Mode.


The two engine lists

Otterly’s homepage says it helps brands “track and boost visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot, and Claude.” Seven engines, in one sentence, with nothing to mark that three of them cost extra.

The pricing page is honest about it: the add-ons are listed with their own prices. Nothing here is concealed, and we are not calling this a trick. It is a packaging decision, and it is the same one most of this market makes.

But it changes the comparison you were making. If you arrived because you needed Gemini coverage, the $29 headline is not your price. And Google AI Mode being an add-on matters more than it sounds, because AI Mode is where Google is putting its conversational search, and it is a different surface from AI Overviews even though both are Google.

The contrast that makes this concrete is Rankscale, reviewed the same week. Ten engines, including Claude, Gemini and AI Mode, on every tier including its $20 one. Rankscale’s own homepage carries the phrase “No Upsell,” which now reads less like copywriting and more like a direct comment on this pricing model.

The reasonable defence, which we would make if we were them: querying seven engines costs seven times as much to run as querying one, and a flat price with everything included either subsidises heavy users or overcharges light ones. Charging for what you use is defensible. It just means the headline price is a floor rather than an answer.


The arithmetic nobody runs: what upgrading actually buys

Here is the number that should decide your tier, and it does not appear in any comparison of this tool we could find.

PlanPricePromptsCost per prompt
Lite$2915$1.93
Standard$189100$1.89
Premium$489400$1.22

Going from Lite to Standard costs 6.5 times as much and gives you 6.7 times the prompts. The effective discount is about two per cent. You are not buying efficiency, you are buying capacity at almost exactly the same unit price.

Premium is where the volume discount finally appears, at 37% off the entry rate.

What to do with that: if 15 prompts is not enough, do not think of Standard as “the next tier up” and assume it is better value. It is the same value, six and a half times larger. Work out how many prompts you genuinely need first, because the pricing gives you no reason to round up. And if you are heading past 100, the jump to Premium is where the economics change, so the question is whether you can use 400.

The add-on rate is worth checking too: 100 extra prompts costs $99 a month on Standard and Premium, which is $0.99 each. That is cheaper per prompt than any plan’s base rate. Standard plus three prompt add-ons lands within a few dollars of Premium for the same 400 prompts, so at that point the tiers converge and the decision is about the other features rather than the maths.


A GEO tool with a Wikipedia article

This is trivia on most review sites. On a blog about AI visibility it is the most interesting fact in the file.

Otterly has an entry in English Wikipedia. No other tool in this comparison does, including the ones that have raised a hundred times more money.

Why that is not a small thing. Wikipedia is among the most heavily weighted sources in the training data and the retrieval layer of most large language models. When an assistant is asked about a company and has a Wikipedia entry available, that entry carries disproportionate influence over the answer. A company selling AI visibility having the single strongest AI-visibility asset in the category is a coherent piece of self-application.

Where we would push back on ourselves: we cannot show that the Wikipedia entry causes better AI visibility for Otterly, because nobody has published a controlled test of that and we have not run one. A July 2026 review of 45 GEO studies found no technique with a demonstrated causal, stable, cross-platform effect, and this is not an exception. It is a strong prior, not a result.

And the honest caveat about copying it: Wikipedia notability is not something you buy or arrange. Attempting to create an article about your own company is against Wikipedia’s conflict-of-interest guidance and tends to end with deletion and a worse reputation than you started with. The lesson is not “get a Wikipedia page.” It is that being genuinely written about by independent sources is what produces one, and that is the same work that produces AI visibility.


The Semrush relationship

Otterly announced a technology partnership with Semrush in January 2025, and Semrush documents it in its own knowledge base.

That is unusual enough to explain. Semrush now sells its own AI Visibility Toolkit at $99 a month per domain, which competes directly with Otterly. A partner integration and a competing first-party product coexisting inside the same company is normal at platform scale, and it tells you something about both.

For Otterly, the upside is real: distribution through the largest SEO platform in the world, and a knowledge base article on a domain with authority far beyond its own.

For you, the risk is worth naming: integrations with a partner that later builds the same feature have a well-documented life cycle. Ask what happens to the integration if Semrush’s own toolkit takes priority, and do not build a reporting workflow that only works while the two companies are friendly.


What we could not verify

  • The free trial length. The site states seven days in one place and fourteen in another. Confirm at signup.
  • Whether the add-on engines are per plan or per prompt. The pricing page lists them without stating how consumption is counted.
  • How many runs sit behind a reported number. Not documented, the same gap almost every vendor here has. Evertune states its sampling.
  • Funding. No round is published and we found no announcement.
  • The customer relationships. Logos on a homepage are a company statement, not an audited list.

The domain, since we check every time now: the company is at otterly.ai, which is also the address everyone links to. otterly.com did not respond for us. After four vendors this month whose obvious address was wrong, a product whose canonical domain is the one you would guess is worth a sentence.


Where Otterly is the right call

  • You are a solo marketer or a small team. $29 for 15 prompts with unlimited seats and daily tracking is a sensible starting point.
  • Your team is larger than your budget. Unlimited team members on every tier is unusual, and it is a real saving against per-seat competitors.
  • You already live in Semrush. The integration and the knowledge base coverage smooth the path.
  • You want a European supplier. An Austrian GmbH with a published register number and VAT ID clears a procurement check.
  • ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot are your whole world. The included four cover most Western discovery.

Where it is the wrong call

  • You need Claude, Gemini or AI Mode. They are add-ons, and Rankscale includes ten engines from $20.
  • You need 30 prompts. There is nothing between 15 and 100, and the 100 costs $189.
  • Your market is China. No Doubao or Qwen, the gap we built for.
  • You need agent-level crawl data. Profound instruments it and this does not.
  • You need attribution against a control. Tracking a number and proving a change moved it are different products.

Otterly versus the alternatives

OtterlyRankscaleSemrushEchoWi
Entry price$29/mo$20/mo$99 per domain€29/mo
Engines included at entry4Full list41
Claude, Gemini, AI ModeAdd-onsIncludedPartlyIncluded
SeatsUnlimitedNot statedFrom $45 eachUnlimited
Doubao, QwenNoNoNoYes
BaseAustriaAustriaUnited StatesSpain

The full comparison covers every tool we could verify, with prices read from each vendor’s own page, plus one that shut down.


Common Questions About Otterly AI

How much does Otterly AI cost?

$29 a month for Lite with 15 prompts, $189 for Standard with 100, and $489 for Premium with 400. Annual billing saves 15%, bringing those to $25, $160 and $422. Enterprise is custom. All tiers include unlimited team members and daily tracking.

Which AI engines does Otterly track?

Four are included on every paid plan: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot. Claude, Google Gemini and Google AI Mode are available as paid add-ons. It does not cover Doubao or Qwen.

Is Otterly’s $29 plan enough?

For one brand with a narrow set of questions, yes. Fifteen prompts is a real constraint though, and the next tier is $189, so work out your prompt count before committing rather than assuming you can step up cheaply.

Does upgrading from Lite to Standard save money?

Barely. Lite works out at $1.93 per prompt and Standard at $1.89, a discount of about two per cent for 6.5 times the spend. The genuine volume discount appears at Premium, which is $1.22 per prompt.

Who is behind Otterly AI?

OtterlyAI GmbH, an Austrian company registered in Persenbeug with company number FN 647749 y, founded in 2024 by Thomas Peham, Klaus-M. Schremser and Josef Trauner.

They announced a technology partnership in January 2025 and Semrush documents Otterly in its own knowledge base. They are also competitors, since Semrush sells its own AI Visibility Toolkit at $99 a month per domain.

What is the best Otterly alternative?

For more engines at a lower entry price, Rankscale. For an incumbent with a free checker, Semrush. For enterprise depth, Profound. For Chinese engines and change-versus-control measurement, that is what we build EchoWi for.


Where this leaves you

Otterly is one of the more grown-up products in this category, and the customer list is the evidence: Roche and IQVIA do not buy from vendors that cannot pass a procurement review. Unlimited seats at every tier is a genuine kindness in a market that meters everything.

The two things to settle before you sign are both arithmetic. Which engines you actually need, because three of the seven advertised cost extra. And how many prompts, because the ladder gives you no reason to buy more than you will use.

Neither is hidden. Both are on the pricing page, in a market where four of the vendors we reviewed this month have no pricing page at all.

Next: the Rankscale review, the Semrush toolkit review, and the full comparison with verified prices.

Compare it yourself

Ask an AI about this article

Opens your assistant with this page already loaded, so you can check the numbers, argue with the method or ask what it means for you.

Perplexity and Google answer straight away. ChatGPT and Claude fill the box and wait for you to press enter, which is their behaviour and not something we can set.

Written by

Maher El Ouahabi

CTO & Co-Founder at EchoWi

Builds the software that shows brands what AI is really saying about them, then what to change so the next answer is better. Twelve engines, measured before and after.

LinkedIn Maher El Ouahabi (opens in new tab)