Skip to content
Software ReviewsGEO Tools

seoClarity ArcAI Review 2026: Nine Engines, Zero Prices, and a $2,500 Floor to Get to Them

ArcAI tracks nine AI engines, the widest list we have verified. All three of its packages say Ask for a Quote, on top of a platform starting at $2,500.

· Updated · 10 min read

ArcAI tracks nine AI engines, which is the widest published coverage in our verified catalogue. It publishes no price for any of them. Its three packages, Core, Discovery and Accuracy, each carry the same button: “Ask for a Quote.”

To reach ArcAI at all you need a seoClarity platform plan, and there the numbers are printed: the cheapest one with a published price is $2,500 a month. So the entry cost of AI visibility here is at least $2,500 plus an unknown, against $0 to $199 for most of this catalogue.

This review exists because somebody has to write down the top of the price range, and the top of the range is where prices stop being printed.

Disclosure: EchoWi competes with seoClarity. Every price, package name, prompt limit and engine name below was read from seoClarity’s platform pricing page and its ArcAI pricing page on 7 August 2026.


The short version

  1. Nine AI engines, the most of any tool we have verified.
  2. ArcAI has no published price. Three packages, three quote requests.
  3. The platform floor is $2,500 a month, or £1,800, on the cheapest tier that shows a number.
  4. All three ArcAI tiers show the same prompt allowance, so they sell function rather than volume.
  5. Both currencies are printed side by side, which is rarer than it should be.

What it costs, verified

The platform, where numbers exist:

PlanMonthlyIn poundsNotes
RankingsCustomCustom“Minimum 2,000 keyword queries”
Research & ContentFrom $2,500From £1,800The cheapest published figure
Technical SEOFrom $3,200From £2,400
EnterpriseFrom $4,500From £3,600“5,000+ keyword queries”

The page adds the qualifier that matters: “All packages are priced based on the number of domains and keywords tracked”, and again lower down, “priced based on the number of domains and keywords tracked (daily or weekly). There’s a great variance depending on” the configuration. So “from $2,500” is a floor and not a price.

ArcAI, where they do not:

PackagePriceWhat the page says it is
CoreAsk for a QuoteBrand visibility, competitors and reporting
DiscoveryAsk for a QuoteAdd-on, AI bot activity
AccuracyAsk for a QuoteAdd-on, brand protection and monitoring

Prompt Queries reads “Starts at 500” on all three. The AI Content Optimizer “include 20 analyses” on all three.

The tiering that is actually well designed

It is worth pausing on that identical row, because it is the opposite of how this market usually works and it is better.

Almost every tool in our catalogue sells the same product three times at three volumes: Nightwatch gives thirty answers per prompt on every tier and charges for more prompts, Waikay holds cost per prompt nearly flat and sells more of them, SISTRIX multiplies prompts by fifteen while multiplying price by under seven.

ArcAI’s three packages start at the same 500 prompt queries and differ by what they do: measure visibility, watch AI bot activity on your site, or monitor and protect how your brand is described. Those are three different jobs, and selling them as three products is more honest than selling one product in three sizes.

That design deserves credit and it makes the missing prices worse, not better. A buyer can tell which of the three jobs they need. They cannot tell what any of them costs.

Nine engines, and one of them is a company

Two rows on the ArcAI page carry the coverage:

  • “Visibility Tracking (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Gemini)”
  • “NEW! Visibility Tracking (Deepseek, Anthropic, CoPilot, Grok)”

Nine in total, and both Google surfaces named separately rather than collapsed into “Google”, which is more precise than Waikay manages and matters because Google’s surfaces cite almost nothing in common.

One entry is the odd one out. “Anthropic” is a company; the assistant is Claude. Every other name on those two rows is a product a person uses. It is a small thing next to a missing price, and it is the eighth time in this catalogue that engine coverage has been written as prose rather than as a list of products, so it goes in the record.

What you cannot work out, and why that is the finding

Every other review we publish ends with an arithmetic section. Here is the one this page allows.

Cost per prompt: not computable. No price.

Cost per engine: not computable. No price.

Total first-year cost: not computable. Two unknowns, one of which (“from $2,500”) is explicitly a floor that varies with domains and keywords.

What is computable is the floor itself. The cheapest published route to ArcAI is Research & Content at $2,500 a month, which is $30,000 a year before the AI product has been quoted at all. For comparison, fifty-nine tools in our verified catalogue publish an entry price under $200 a month, starting at free and running through $29, $39, $59, $69.95, €79, €87.20, €119 and $199.

That comparison is not fair as a like-for-like, and we would rather say so than let it stand: seoClarity is an enterprise SEO platform with crawlers, data warehouses and managed services, and ArcAI is a module inside it. Nobody buys this instead of a $29 prompt tracker. But a buyer who wants to know what AI visibility costs is entitled to an answer, and the answer here is that you have to ask.

Where seoClarity ArcAI is the right call

  • You are already a seoClarity customer. The module sits in a platform your team uses and your data is already there. This is by far the strongest case.
  • You need coverage nobody else publishes. Nine engines including Copilot, Grok and DeepSeek is genuinely the widest list we have verified, and if your buyers use one of the unusual ones, that list is the product.
  • You need AI bot activity on your own site. The Discovery package covers what AI crawlers fetch from you, which is a different instrument from prompt sampling and answers a different question.
  • Procurement expects a quote anyway. At enterprise scale a published price is often irrelevant, because the contract is negotiated and the invoice never matches the page.

Where it is the wrong call

  • You want to compare it before talking to anyone. You cannot, on either half of the purchase.
  • You are a mid-market brand. The floor is a full-time salary’s worth of software before the AI part is quoted.
  • You only want AI visibility. You would be buying an enterprise SEO platform to reach an add-on.
  • You need a number this quarter. Two quote conversations, and the platform figure is itself a “starts at”.

What we could not verify

  • Any ArcAI price. All three packages say “Ask for a Quote”.
  • Whether ArcAI can be bought standalone. Neither page says it requires a platform plan, and neither says it does not.
  • What “Starts at 500” prompt queries means per period. No time unit is attached.
  • How often each prompt is checked, which is what turns a query allowance into an answer count.
  • What the platform price actually becomes. “Priced based on the number of domains and keywords tracked”, with “great variance” acknowledged on the page.
  • Whether “Anthropic” means Claude’s consumer app, its API, or both.

seoClarity ArcAI versus the alternatives

ToolPublished entry priceEnginesPrice for the AI product?
seoClarity ArcAI$2,500 platform floor9No
ScalePostNot published4No
XFunnelFree audit, then custom9No
Athena HQ$2958Yes
Alhena$1995Yes, bundled
Waikay$69.954Yes
Promptmonitor$296Yes

The full verified table, with the date each price was read, is in our comparison of GEO tools.

Read that last column down the page. The three tools with no published price for their AI product are the three at the top of the market, and two of them carry the widest engine lists. Coverage and opacity travel together in this category, which is worth knowing before you assume the longest feature list is the best buy.

Common Questions About seoClarity ArcAI

How much does seoClarity ArcAI cost?

It does not say. All three ArcAI packages, Core, Discovery and Accuracy, show “Ask for a Quote” instead of a price. The platform it sits in publishes floors: Research & Content from $2,500 a month or £1,800, Technical SEO from $3,200, Enterprise from $4,500, all “priced based on the number of domains and keywords tracked”. Read on 7 August 2026.

Which AI engines does ArcAI track?

Nine, across two rows: ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Mode, AI Overviews and Gemini, then Deepseek, Anthropic, CoPilot and Grok. Only Goodie’s twelve and XFunnel’s nine-plus-two-coming match or beat it, and neither publishes a price for that tier either. Note that both Google surfaces are named separately, which is more precise than most, and that “Anthropic” is the company behind Claude rather than the assistant’s name.

Can I buy ArcAI without the seoClarity platform?

Neither page says. The ArcAI pricing page describes Discovery and Accuracy as add-ons but does not state what they are added to, and the platform pricing page lists ArcAI among its optional modules. Ask before assuming either way.

What is the difference between the three ArcAI packages?

Function, not volume. All three show the same “Starts at 500” prompt queries and the same 20 content analyses. Core is brand visibility, competitors and reporting; Discovery adds AI bot activity on your own site; Accuracy adds brand protection and monitoring. Selling three jobs rather than three sizes is a better structure than most of this market offers.

Is it worth it?

If you already run seoClarity, the module is the obvious choice and the only real question is the quote. If you do not, you would be buying an enterprise SEO platform to reach an add-on, and our catalogue holds 59 tools under $200 a month with a published price. The honest comparison is not price against price; it is whether you need the platform.

Why do the most expensive tools publish the fewest prices?

We can only report the pattern, not the reason. Of the tools in our catalogue, the three that publish no price for their AI product are the three aimed at enterprises, and two of those three carry the widest engine coverage. The practical consequence for a buyer is that the longest feature list and the least comparable price tend to arrive together.

Ask an AI about this article

Opens your assistant with this page already loaded, so you can check the numbers, argue with the method or ask what it means for you.

Perplexity and Google answer straight away. ChatGPT and Claude fill the box and wait for you to press enter, which is their behaviour and not something we can set.

Written by

Maher El Ouahabi

CTO & Co-Founder at EchoWi

Builds the software that shows brands what AI is really saying about them, then what to change so the next answer is better. Twelve engines, measured before and after.

LinkedIn Maher El Ouahabi (opens in new tab)